I think it's either tyres difference (new vs old, especially Russell tyres are extremely old) or there is something missing on his car (maybe the engineers forgot to put some ballast on it)
Toto didn't look happy after the chequered flag
1.5 KG ~ advantage 0.15s/lap, could explain how quick Russell was in the final stint despite running 20+ laps old Hards
It's official, Russell has been DQ'd from the race.
Everyone else moves up 1 spot. Leclerc gets a podium finish.
It's not how start but how you finish.
Merc tried to leave fuel in the car to keep it legal. They need to be punished more.
Race ban for Toto please
Fuel gague man, that's so not right!
We have come away with 27points today which considering our rivals results we didn't do too badly. What a pity McLaren has made such a step forward. RB are not having the best of seasons.
Mclaren 28
Merc 25
RB 19
Forza Jules
Mercedes already admitted it was entirely their mistake that Russell's car was underweight. Hamilton's car was okay.
You can run like the wind, but you'll never outrun the Prancing Horse
I suppose the tyres also degrade less if the car is lighter.
This really should've been the year to win the WCC and it looked so good for it early on in the season. Considering that McLaren and Mercedes are constantly tripwiring themselves it makes the feeling even worse.
Yup. But the actual point is Ferrari started on a good note this season from where they left off with 2023 strong 2nd half.
It was Barcelona package that made the car bounce on 1Lap & this disturbed the balance.
Hence drivers were facing problem around the corners when they try to push to the limit.
Then they continued investing on the same package by trying different set ups (with leclerc). Ferrari feel potential is there with Barcelona package. When they limit this bouncing issue, I would see Ferrari to unlock atleast 0.2-0.3 tenth’s of performance.
Eagerly waiting to see upgrades after summer break, how will they resolve this issue.
Yes, he had 2 new mediums and 2 new hards.
And as for though process, each time I read Fred's post race comments, I get the impression that he's leaving in a different universe. According to him, the gap is "one or two tenths".
Yet the drivers and engineers saying we are losing 3 tenths. I don't know what's going on inside this team.
All the posts just talking about Sainz finishing 6th! No mention not even once the name Leclerc !!
Well I will break the mould. Charles expected more at Spa and was very disappointed. He clearly saw more in the car after his Friday experiments.
Forza Jules
Well the 2/3 of the race where very good. He was among the fastest. That's why right then we all start dreaming about a possible win.
It's that last stint on hards that ruined everything .
So personally I will focus in the positive first 2 stints and hope that the team has found some cure for our problems and till Singapore we will once again fight for pole/ wins.
Why the team brought Charles in so early for his final pitstop beggars belief. His tyres were fine according to the driver and he should know.
But the race is over now so it's onwards and upwards to the 2nd part of the season.
Forza Jules
the gap in qualifying and in the race are definitely different
how much of the gap in race pace is "pure performance" and how much is just not being able to turn on the tyres?
or do the other teams have that advantage in the race as well, they're just not able to exploit it because they have to conserve the tyres, so in effect the tyres level the playing field because the teams reach the maximum pace they allow. As long as you have the pace to drive to the pace of the tyres, you're competitive in the race.
i don't know what the answer is, i think there is 1-2 tenths of pure performance needed either way, and obviously a better qualifying package. With 1-2 tenths, starting from where Leclerc started, does he win that race yesterday? I think so.
https://newsgistdaily.com/.../boomsh...s-hamilton.../
Is this what Charles will have to deal with next year and beyond?
Forza Jules
Bookmarks