also the Fizzy drink guys have also messed up their strategy too, like in Spain last year, so they're not immune as some here have suggested
so you're willing to let Maxipad finish in front of Leclerc as long as a Ferrari wins the race?
the way that plays out is a Ferrari 1 -3 or Ferrari 1 - 4 with Maxipad gaining even more on Leclerc than he did anyway, still far from ideal
the only viable winning strategy at that point was to stay out, how many times have we seen Shamilton just nurse wet tyres into slicks.
i'd agree, but people here seem to think we could have gotten Leclerc the win with that strat. And it's not an easy decision to make, to voluntarily let your rival beat you.
and we did cover Perez with Sainz, we just got stuck behind the moving chicane because our driver thought that you aren't allowed the pit exit line.
So Carlos is not a team player...
This won't go down well in Maranello since NO DRIVER is ABOVE the TEAM!
Hero's come and go, but legends never die!
AMuS
Schmidt said that Gasly and Vettel choose the perfect time to switch to intermediates.
The intermediates were at one point 4s faster, both Gasly and Vettel did everything correctly in terms of timing, but unfortunately they couldn’t overtake due to the nature of the circuit.
Schmidt said that Perez was "used" by Red Bull to get Ferrari to pit too early & at the end, it turned out very well for Checo.
Ferrari had two options with Charles: either pitting one lap after Perez (which would have guaranteed him to stay ahead of Perez) or waiting like Sainz.
1st mistake: Ferrari pitted Charles two laps after Perez, which made Red Bull’s overcut work.
2nd mistake: pitting Charles at the same time as Carlos, the gap was too small, so it was obvious that Charles would needed to wait
in the pits & the undercut attempt against Max failed.
Schmidt agreed with Ferrari that Sainz lost a potential win due to being stuck in traffic and he also defended Ferrari a bit:
Schmidt mentioned that Perez did have a bit of luck with the bad strategy of Ferrari BUT he also did two excellent outlaps on the intermediates and slick tyres
(Mercedes engineers told him that).
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/...her-ricciardo/
It's not how start but how you finish.
And when were we at our best?That goes both ways! W C C win is where it's at.
But of course when Reubens was playing his part.
Finally, you get it. We need Carlos to be our new Reubens !
"If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari" - Gilles Villeneuve
Michael in 3 years got one podium 2nd place while @ Merc when he came back. No Rubens; No wins. It's early in the season, who knows maybe it will be Charles moving over for Carlos. Monaco was real! A Rubenized Leclerc could be the answer to WCC and throw in a WDC for Carlos. Just look over @ Merc ; Lewis the GOAT of F-1 now has his team mate ahead of him. It's the team that counts.
You want your best driver to be second driver Brembo?
Hero's come and go, but legends never die!
We all know for years that Charles is the best and the fastest of the two.
Oke he overdrives the car, so did Max a few years ago but look what he became...
Same will happen to Charles when he learns more things and gain new experience.
Carlos was better yes in 1 race. Charles was the best in the rest.
Hero's come and go, but legends never die!
Well yeah to some extent after Ferrari messed up Leclerc's strategy by waiting 2 laps to pit Leclerc after Perez pitted and made 2 laps and went for the undercut.
But then, Ferrari messed up the 2nd pit stop for both drivers and double stacked them when the gap to Max was very narrow.
It's not how start but how you finish.
You really need to drink less. It's bad for your liver and apparently it ruins your brain cells.
Merc did not have a race worthy car, and Schumacher went there because he just wanted to have fun and also to organize mercendes. But you know it.
He did not go to Merc to win championships.
Brembo knows that Bottas has been reubenized, just like Checo has been reubenized.More like Irvine as Barrichello basically argued against team orders and deliberately made a whole spectacle of it which made Ferrari look bad, instead of it being a non-event like Perez allowing Verstappen to pass him a few races back.
He just closes his eyes to it.
It's ok, we know he's a troll.
"If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari" - Gilles Villeneuve
Then you're ignorant.I believe it's far too soon to determine which of Ferrari's drivers is the best.
"If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari" - Gilles Villeneuve
I know my weaknesses in English, but I would be curious to know your level of French
And then not in fact
Did you seen my present for you (post 23)?
http://www.thescuderia.net/forums/sh...#post1062861:-)
Last edited by Gilles; 7th June 2022 at 19:30.
Sait Ferrari Driver pour gagner! Presents over controversy welcomed always!
French no . Charles over Carlos for a better chance for clean race win. But.... at the risk of giving you a headache ; please let them race each other unless a team order is truly going to help at a race. Porpoising has to stop for the sake of both drivers esp Charles . He says it's really hurting him.
Bookmarks