Page 44 of 80 FirstFirst ... 19303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575869 ... LastLast
Results 1,291 to 1,320 of 2373

Thread: Scuderia Ferrari SF16-H Development thread.

  1. #1291
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    45
    From f1analisitecnica:
    Ferrari will spend 3 tokens out of 9 to bring two new ICE with better combustion chamber, along with a new Shell fuel.

    The turbocompressor will be fixed in Canada.

    And some aero updates to the front of the car, but no S-duct.

  2. #1292
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    France
    Posts
    21
    Anrasp, there is a problem in your logic in my opinion. I can't say at the same time :
    - that Mercedes is unbeatable on the basis of Hamilton performance
    - that Hamilton was slower than Raikonen because of his damages.

  3. #1293
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,107
    Considering the fact hat Seb is already on his 2nd PU, and an updated version will be at Sochi, I find it strange that Seb would already be on his 3th ICE after 4 races..
    “The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few.” ~ Enzo Ferrari

  4. #1294
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Kristof_F40 View Post
    Considering the fact hat Seb is already on his 2nd PU, and an updated version will be at Sochi, I find it strange that Seb would already be on his 3th ICE after 4 races..
    Yes, they plan to go back to previous engines in tracks that engines are not that important like Monaco or Singapore

  5. #1295
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,107
    Quote Originally Posted by NyX View Post
    Yes, they plan to go back to previous engines in tracks that engines are not that important like Monaco or Singapore
    Yes read it aswell.. Good thing they ignore the Bahrain problem with Seb and just follow their plan. In the end of the day, with the field like it is: if we would get 10 place penalty we would still be able to score a podium so.. Better to try and catch Mercs on performance
    “The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few.” ~ Enzo Ferrari

  6. #1296
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northglenn
    Posts
    2,678
    Quote Originally Posted by theodorefabrice View Post
    Anrasp, there is a problem in your logic in my opinion. I can't say at the same time :
    - that Mercedes is unbeatable on the basis of Hamilton performance
    - that Hamilton was slower than Raikonen because of his damages.
    Actually if you look at Bahrain:

    Maximum speed - Qualification:

    1st sector Vettel Rosberg 251.4 252.9
    2nd sector Raikkonen Hamilton 277.6 277.7
    3rd sector Vettel Hamilton 297.2 301.5

    maximum speed - Race:

    1st sector Raikkonen Hamilton 238.6 246.1
    2nd sector Rosberg Raikkonen 254.7 256.6
    3rd sector Raikkonen Hamilton 297.7 302.0
    President, Scuderia Ferrari Club of Denver - The Official Passion
    http://www.scuderiaferrari.club
    denver@scuderiaferrari.club

  7. #1297
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Italia
    Posts
    59
    La Gazzetta was the first to say important upgrades on the engine (and something for aero) in Russia, last week.

    Motorsport this morning, confirmed Ferrari were working on combustion (adding they spent 3 tokens). It's incredible how Ferrari has been fast with the upgrades! Hope everything will be okay :)


    For the rotation of the engines.. Seb should end the season with 5 engines

  8. #1298
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,106
    Wonder how much this new upgrade engines will bring
    #PrayforMH370 #KeepFightingSchumi

  9. #1299
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Italia
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by fronaldo View Post
    Wonder how much this new upgrade engines will bring
    I think it's focused more on reliability than on performance :)

  10. #1300
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    319
    Ferrari considers bold engine update plan for Russian GP

    Ferrari is considering spending its first engine development tokens in time for the Russian Grand Prix in a bold bid to get its season back on track, Motosport.com can reveal.

    Despite having shown strong pace in the first three events, Ferrari is yet to fully capitalise on that form and deliver a victory it so seeks.

    But now, despite an engine failure for Sebastian Vettel in Bahrain that means he is already on his second powerunit, the Maranello outfit is weighing up a radical idea of introducing an updated third engine already.

    Sources have revealed that Ferrari had unlocked horsepower improvements on the dyno and is willing to spend three of its remaining nine development tokens to bring the combustion updates to track already.

    It is thought that both Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Raikkonen will get the new engine if the team decides to go ahead with its plan.

    No downside

    Although it would seem strange to have Vettel already put on to his third power unit of the five he is allowed this season, the reality is that a rotation system means there would be little downside.

    That is because 30-40 percent of engine mileage is done in free practice sessions, where Ferrari can deploy the older specification of engines.

    Furthermore, there are events – like the Monaco and Singapore Grands Prix – that are not so power critical so the newer units may not be so essential to be used there.

    On the other hand, Russia is a power-sensitive track thanks to its long straights – and it is this situation that has made Ferrari consider a change to its plan.

    Marchionne hint

    Ferrari president Sergio Marchionne dropped a hint about the scheme in China last weekend when he suggested the team was ready to bring forward developments.

    Reflecting on the season, he said: “Things are going in the right direction. We have set ourselves important objectives, but we must learn to know a completely new car, so mistakes are understandable.

    “Despite everything we could have won in Australia, and in general I am happy with the progress.

    “But we have much work ahead of us, and we will bring forward an important development. Also, we know that Mercedes will not stop developing, so we have no illusions that they will be easily beaten

  11. #1301
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    bulgaria
    Posts
    353
    Nah combustion upgrade + new fuel is for performance surely. They wouldn't change to a new ICE so soon if they didn't think that they have found a good step forward. I'm optimistic since we finally have a great chassis, and if the PU becomes competitive we are there.

  12. #1302
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by cokata View Post
    Nah combustion upgrade + new fuel is for performance surely. They wouldn't change to a new ICE so soon if they didn't think that they have found a good step forward. I'm optimistic since we finally have a great chassis, and if the PU becomes competitive we are there.
    Good point. I also think this will help compensate for turbo issues because now we'll be able to produce more hp even with a "sick" turbo

  13. #1303
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Kiato-Greece
    Posts
    4,467
    If we are actually have turbo issues,then why to spend tokens for combustion updates???
    Isn't the turbo ready or we 're not having any issues in there????
    FERRARI FOR EVER !!!!!!!

  14. #1304
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northglenn
    Posts
    2,678
    Quote Originally Posted by PURE PASSION View Post
    If we are actually have turbo issues,then why to spend tokens for combustion updates???
    Isn't the turbo ready or we 're not having any issues in there????
    Well if the combustion updates will bring you more performance now, allow you to win, and then only perform better with the turbo update, why not just go ahead and get started now..
    President, Scuderia Ferrari Club of Denver - The Official Passion
    http://www.scuderiaferrari.club
    denver@scuderiaferrari.club

  15. #1305
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Kiato-Greece
    Posts
    4,467
    Quote Originally Posted by GrndLkNatv View Post
    Well if the combustion updates will bring you more performance now, allow you to win, and then only perform better with the turbo update, why not just go ahead and get started now..
    Just asking!!!whatever make us faster,is fine with me!!!!
    FERRARI FOR EVER !!!!!!!

  16. #1306
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    bulgaria
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by PURE PASSION View Post
    Just asking!!!whatever make us faster,is fine with me!!!!
    http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2016...-un-nuovo.html

    The turbo fix is scheduled for Canada. The new combustion upgrade + fuel is said to improve mean horsepower as well as deliver more exhaust flow which should help with MGU-H recovery indirectly without changing the turbo design.

  17. #1307
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Atlanta GA, USA
    Posts
    348
    Under the PU regulations you don't have to spend tokens to fix a reliability issue. If they are spending 3 tokens on the combustion chamber changes, its for performance. That doesn't mean they can't fix reliability issues at the same time. But they would not spend tokens on reliability alone as those changes are free.

    It is a little scary if Seb does end up on PU #3 by race #4. But I think its worth the risk if it allows Ferrari to close on or better yet exceed the performance of the Merc.

  18. #1308
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Atlanta GA, USA
    Posts
    348
    Speaking of PU perform vs. Merc, this video would seem to indicate the Ferrari PU and the Merc PU are very similar as the acceleration of Kimi and Hamilton is virtually identical:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/...227200/video/1

  19. #1309
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kitchener, CANADA
    Posts
    10,157
    Quote Originally Posted by f300v10 View Post
    Under the PU regulations you don't have to spend tokens to fix a reliability issue. If they are spending 3 tokens on the combustion chamber changes, its for performance. That doesn't mean they can't fix reliability issues at the same time. But they would not spend tokens on reliability alone as those changes are free.

    It is a little scary if Seb does end up on PU #3 by race #4. But I think its worth the risk if it allows Ferrari to close on or better yet exceed the performance of the Merc.
    I personally think Ferrari know exactly what they,re doing
    They want to close and like you said even surpass the performance of the Merc as early in the season as possible and like you said, if they are concerned of any reliability issues they'll be fixed using NO tokens for that matter

    And if Seb will need to use a 6th engine towards the end of season I'm sure Ferrari will use one at a track where overtaking is much easier and if the engine will be that much better I'm sure if Seb starts 10th (assuming he'll be on pole) I'm sure he'll end up on the podium that race

    But all in all I like the philosophy approach Ferrari is taking under the new management

    Forza Ferrari
    So 2023 started off bad, but managed to claw back some lap time come end of the year. Lets hope SF24 will give us tifosi something to smile about.

  20. #1310
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northglenn
    Posts
    2,678
    Quote Originally Posted by f300v10 View Post
    Under the PU regulations you don't have to spend tokens to fix a reliability issue. If they are spending 3 tokens on the combustion chamber changes, its for performance. That doesn't mean they can't fix reliability issues at the same time. But they would not spend tokens on reliability alone as those changes are free.

    It is a little scary if Seb does end up on PU #3 by race #4. But I think its worth the risk if it allows Ferrari to close on or better yet exceed the performance of the Merc.
    I don't think it's scary at all, the engines would all receive the same amount of wear whether you use them for 5 races straight, or whether you space them out... Either way as the season winds down he will have less fresh engines, but in the worst case, he takes a 10 spot and then makes up the difference with acquired performance gain.
    President, Scuderia Ferrari Club of Denver - The Official Passion
    http://www.scuderiaferrari.club
    denver@scuderiaferrari.club

  21. #1311
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Helsinki
    Posts
    4,164
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormsearcher View Post
    We shouldnt fool ourselves. That merc has a lot more in reserve than they are showing. Hamilton started from the back, had to do 5 pit stops, had a nose cone change.. and then ended up 7th. How many teams can do that? That merc is way ahead of the competition. We have a long way to go.
    Arrivabene said that we are 0.1 sec behind Mercs, that was in some interview this week. I do believe him, we are close now.

    Kimi was P22 after 15 laps and ended P5 in Shanghai.

    Also in quali, Kimi was 0.05 after ROS after 2 sectors, and then he did a mistake in last sector.

  22. #1312
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    bulgaria
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by f300v10 View Post
    Speaking of PU perform vs. Merc, this video would seem to indicate the Ferrari PU and the Merc PU are very similar as the acceleration of Kimi and Hamilton is virtually identical:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/...227200/video/1
    No that looks terrible. Kimi had a very healthy dose of slipstreaming from the Sauber infront of him and he was barely gaining on Hamilton.

  23. #1313
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Atlanta GA, USA
    Posts
    348
    So you can do CDF analysis on the slipstream with your eyes? Very impressive. ;) The slipstream on an F1 car drops off very fast with distance and would have little effect until they are over at least 300 KPH. You can see at the end that Kimi does start to pull way once he starts to get the benefit of the Sauber up ahead.

  24. #1314
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    319
    Are these PU limited to 12k Rpm or 15k Rpm ? because almost all onboards I've seen these cars dont go above 12k

  25. #1315
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Cricova, Moldova
    Posts
    626
    Quote Originally Posted by cokata View Post
    No that looks terrible. Kimi had a very healthy dose of slipstreaming from the Sauber infront of him and he was barely gaining on Hamilton.
    It all started with Hamilton having a much better traction at the exit of the corner, hence better acceleration matched by Kimi with the slipstreaming on Sauber. So yeah, the comparison is not the best one right here.
    Ferrari per sempre !

  26. #1316
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Melb, Australia
    Posts
    362
    Translated from http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2016...-un-nuovo.html

    GP SOCHI: from a high severity circuit for the internal combustion engine, designed by Hermann Tilke
    The circuit along 5853 meters, is the third in the Formula 1 calendar in order of length, after the Spa-Francorchamps circuit in Belgium and to Silverstone in Britain. It 'was designed by Hermann Tilke as many other circuits introduced since 1999 in Formula 1. The Russian circuit has twelve right-handers and only six left. If the first sector it can be considered the fastest part of the circuit, the second and especially the third well are more techniques for the drivers and their respective cars. Predominate 90 ° bends from third gear with external high curbs and stepped touting much tires and aerodynamic devices.

    From a more technical point of view we are talking of a medium severity circuit for the brakes, similar to the Shanghai circuit, while for the internal combustion engine will be back on a style Bahrain circuit, ie of high stringency where the recovery from MGU-H and K will still be crucial since we are talking about almost 3 seconds a lap of influence. In Russia it will count very much to have a really efficient recovery from MGU-H, the electric motor that can recover more than twice the energy per lap of MGU-K.

    FERRARI TEAM: among the many problems we have not collected the expected results
    Ferrari, due to various problems, in the first three races of the season has not collected the results that management had expected. In the first race of the season, thanks to an excellent start and without the red flag, Vettel could probably win the tender, with the other red on the track, Kimi Raikkonen, who was forced to retire due to a rupture of the impeller turbine. Bahrain Vettel was KO'd in the formation lap for a software problem while Raikkonen took second place without too much trouble the Mercedes of Rosberg. China Ferrari did not experience any technical problems due to the use of more "safe" mappings than those of Bahrain, not picking the best result that the car offered due to some mistakes of the pilots, both in qualifying and in the race .

    FERRARI SF16-H: anticipated updates to the Power Unit for the assault groped to W07 Hybrid
    Next Sunday it will race on a track that has always proved tricky for the Maranello car, but Ferrari has now surely the obligation to react and demonstrate that they have the speed to put least pressure the Anglo-German Mercedes.

    To do that will be brought by the Italian Scuderia some aerodynamic updates to the car (important and eagerly awaited news on the front) and above will speak in advance of the road map planned earlier in the year, even on the Power Unit.

    As we state for the past few weeks, Ferrari has major problems to the power unit that does not allow the SF16-H to fight on equal terms with the new, strong, weapon of Team Mercedes, the W07 Hybrid. To solve the problems described several times on these pages, to be able to take full advantage of all the horses of the new power unit of Maranello has been designed to introduce the updates in two main phases.
    In Russia (the upgrade was originally designed for the Spanish Grand Prix) will speak on the combustion chamber while in Canada there will be some changes to the turbocharger group. These two important updates should go to resolve issues at the Power Unit which we already analyzed several times in previous posts.

  27. #1317
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    California USA
    Posts
    404
    can't wait for the updates
    may the FORZA FERRARI BE WITH YOU!!!!!

  28. #1318
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,700
    Quote Originally Posted by phsyklone View Post
    Are these PU limited to 12k Rpm or 15k Rpm ? because almost all onboards I've seen these cars dont go above 12k
    The regulations limit to 15k, but in order to last to the end of the race with fuel they are all limiting to 11500 - 12000 rpm.
    Forza Ferrari !
    "You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." - Juan Manuel Fangio

  29. #1319
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    bulgaria
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by abbottcostello View Post
    The regulations limit to 15k, but in order to last to the end of the race with fuel they are all limiting to 11500 - 12000 rpm.
    That's false. The rules are made so that the max fuel flow happens at 10.5k RPM, and it can't go higher then that. Higher revs are less efficient so you will make less power with the fuel you've got also the higher the revs the less reliable the PU will be. The reason they go to ~12k is that when they shift up a gear they end up with ~10.5K RPM for the next one.

  30. #1320
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,107
    Quote Originally Posted by GrndLkNatv View Post
    Actually if you look at Bahrain:

    Maximum speed - Qualification:

    1st sector Vettel Rosberg 251.4 252.9
    2nd sector Raikkonen Hamilton 277.6 277.7
    3rd sector Vettel Hamilton 297.2 301.5

    maximum speed - Race:

    1st sector Raikkonen Hamilton 238.6 246.1
    2nd sector Rosberg Raikkonen 254.7 256.6
    3rd sector Raikkonen Hamilton 297.7 302.0
    Interesting. So it's probably true that we aren't using full potential during the whole race.
    Why is the difference in S2 so big qualy vs. race?
    “The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few.” ~ Enzo Ferrari

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •